CP to Buy KCS
-
- The Conrail Guru
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:34 pm
- Location: Bottom of Lake Mead
Re: CP to Buy KCS
the contents of the above post are my opinion and mine alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.
- ns8401
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 3988
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:57 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL/Ann Arbor MI
- Contact:
Re: CP to Buy KCS
Let the bidding war begin.NSSD70ACe wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 7:58 amCN has jumped into the fray with a “superior” offer:
https://www.connectedcontinent.com/
Celebrating Over 3800 Posts in HD
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side
- Saturnalia
- Authority on Cat
- Posts: 15412
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
- Location: Michigan City, IN
- Contact:
Re: CP to Buy KCS
If nothing else, it will force CP to raise their bid. I doubt the STB would approve a CN-KCS merger as easily as CP-KCS because CN and KCS are already parallel though the heartland, versus CP-KCS being a true end-to-end merger. A CN-KCS merger would effectively lock CP out of the Gulf/Mexican markets and create uneven competition.ns8401 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:35 amLet the bidding war begin.NSSD70ACe wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 7:58 amCN has jumped into the fray with a “superior” offer:
https://www.connectedcontinent.com/
I’m fine with CP-KCS, but not really CN-KCS. But I bet the plan is to force their competitor to pay more, and perhaps earn concessions beneficial to CN, including perhaps more favorable access to Mexico.
CN Pushes for KCS
The battle of the Canadian giants continues. CN is submitting a bigger and better financial offer to KCS than CP has offered. I don’t see this happening because KCS has already agreed to terms with CP, but you never know.
It’s interesting that CN’s argument for being a better partner with KCS really comes down to Michigan and Chicago. CN has a very valid argument that CN + KCS would be better for shippers because they could provide single railroad access from Mexico to Michigan and Eastern Canada. While I don’t think the STB would approve a CN + KCS merger, it’s interesting that a lot of this comes down to who owns trackage in Michigan and can access eastern Canada on their own rails.
At the same time, a CN + KCS merger wouldn’t provide as good of synergies if you were shipping from Western Canada to Texas or Mexico, however I don’t think there is much traffic on that lane. I think the Mexico-Michigan-Ontario lane is busier due to auto parts being made in Mexico shipping up to assembly plants here.
Will be interesting to see what happens! CN would also keep the KCS name and brand, so to us railfans, KCS would stick around. We just might see more KCS power here in Michigan on the CN tracks.
https://www.connectedcontinent.com/?fbc ... vXxzZ9QIxw
It’s interesting that CN’s argument for being a better partner with KCS really comes down to Michigan and Chicago. CN has a very valid argument that CN + KCS would be better for shippers because they could provide single railroad access from Mexico to Michigan and Eastern Canada. While I don’t think the STB would approve a CN + KCS merger, it’s interesting that a lot of this comes down to who owns trackage in Michigan and can access eastern Canada on their own rails.
At the same time, a CN + KCS merger wouldn’t provide as good of synergies if you were shipping from Western Canada to Texas or Mexico, however I don’t think there is much traffic on that lane. I think the Mexico-Michigan-Ontario lane is busier due to auto parts being made in Mexico shipping up to assembly plants here.
Will be interesting to see what happens! CN would also keep the KCS name and brand, so to us railfans, KCS would stick around. We just might see more KCS power here in Michigan on the CN tracks.
https://www.connectedcontinent.com/?fbc ... vXxzZ9QIxw
- ns8401
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 3988
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:57 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL/Ann Arbor MI
- Contact:
Re: CP to Buy KCS
That seems like the most likely scenario to me. Bluffing to try to get some things out of it.Saturnalia wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:38 amIf nothing else, it will force CP to raise their bid. I doubt the STB would approve a CN-KCS merger as easily as CP-KCS because CN and KCS are already parallel though the heartland, versus CP-KCS being a true end-to-end merger. A CN-KCS merger would effectively lock CP out of the Gulf/Mexican markets and create uneven competition.ns8401 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:35 amLet the bidding war begin.NSSD70ACe wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 7:58 amCN has jumped into the fray with a “superior” offer:
https://www.connectedcontinent.com/
I’m fine with CP-KCS, but not really CN-KCS. But I bet the plan is to force their competitor to pay more, and perhaps earn concessions beneficial to CN, including perhaps more favorable access to Mexico.
Celebrating Over 3800 Posts in HD
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side
- DaveO
- Read more, think more, post less
- Posts: 1469
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:57 pm
- Location: Between here and there
Re: CN Pushes for KCS
The KCS Board of Directors has a fiduciary duty involved here. If they don't take the best offer, they're subject to being sued for breach of their fiduciary duty by one or more of the KCS stockholders.
- GTW Dude
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:46 pm
- Location: Somewhere on the Mt. Clemens Sub
Re: CP to Buy KCS
BUY KCS STOCK NOW LMAO
- MQT1223
- O Scale Railfanner
- Posts: 4096
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
- Location: Grandville, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: CP to Buy KCS
CN has entered the fray... not sure how bad they want it or if they are just trying to stonewall CP. I feel like with the overlap of the old IC down by the gulf they would face a lot more regulatory hurdles, however the Flint, Holly and South Bend Subs would be one of the busiest mainlines in the country with a CN-KCS merger.
The rivalry seems to be peaking between the big Canadian Giants... was it like this when CSX and NS were going after Conrail?
The rivalry seems to be peaking between the big Canadian Giants... was it like this when CSX and NS were going after Conrail?
1223 OUT! President and Founder of the Buck Creek Central, the Rolling River Route! (2012-2017) President and Founder of the Lamberton Valley Railroad, The Tin Plate Road! Proudly railfanning with Asperger's since 1996.
-
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 2027
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:13 pm
- Location: Roseville, Michigan!!!!
Re: CP to Buy KCS
It is exciting to watch this happen! I, however, want to see KCS stay Independent!!!! Well if CN keeps their name that is better! Or will it be like all other railroads CN has bought? Hopefully not! I don't want to see re-paints in "CN" paint with "KCS" sublettering! WOW!!!! If this is rejected by the STB, does that mean CP may then get it?MQT1223 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:28 pmCN has entered the fray... not sure how bad they want it or if they are just trying to stonewall CP. I feel like with the overlap of the old IC down by the gulf they would face a lot more regulatory hurdles, however the Flint, Holly and South Bend Subs would be one of the busiest mainlines in the country with a CN-KCS merger.
The rivalry seems to be peaking between the big Canadian Giants... was it like this when CSX and NS were going after Conrail?
Well, let's not get ahead of ourselves HAHA!!!!
Robert Jackson (Extreme Railfan/Bluewater and Michigan Transit Museum member)
http://cooltrains.rrpicturearchives.net/
http://cooltrains.rrpicturearchives.net/
- DaveO
- Read more, think more, post less
- Posts: 1469
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:57 pm
- Location: Between here and there
Re: CP to Buy KCS
The STB can deny the purchase of KCS by both CN and CP.
The Department of Justice will consider if the purchase by either CN or CP is in compliance with anti-monopoly and other laws.
Of course there is always the possibility of various court actions.
So yes, you're getting ahead of yourself
The Department of Justice will consider if the purchase by either CN or CP is in compliance with anti-monopoly and other laws.
Of course there is always the possibility of various court actions.
So yes, you're getting ahead of yourself
- ns8401
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 3988
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:57 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL/Ann Arbor MI
- Contact:
Re: CP to Buy KCS
Yes it was similar then.MQT1223 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:28 pmCN has entered the fray... not sure how bad they want it or if they are just trying to stonewall CP. I feel like with the overlap of the old IC down by the gulf they would face a lot more regulatory hurdles, however the Flint, Holly and South Bend Subs would be one of the busiest mainlines in the country with a CN-KCS merger.
The rivalry seems to be peaking between the big Canadian Giants... was it like this when CSX and NS were going after Conrail?
Celebrating Over 3800 Posts in HD
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side
Re: CP to Buy KCS
I’m very interested to see what the STB has to say about this. The STB is responsible for ensuring monopolies aren’t formed and that there is enhanced competition. They also are responsible for ensuring the merger has a positive impact on shippers.
In my opinion, I think CP-KCS is more favorable for competition, but the CN-KCS is more favorable to shippers. To me, there isn’t a perfect solution.
In my opinion, I think CP-KCS is more favorable for competition, but the CN-KCS is more favorable to shippers. To me, there isn’t a perfect solution.
-
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 999
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 9:43 am
Re: CP to Buy KCS
Hoping this is not a dumb question here, but since both CP and CN both want KCS, and there seems to be pros and cons to either railroad acquiring KCS, is it possible that KCS could be split up among both CP and CN, much like Conrail was with NS and CSX??
Re: CP to Buy KCS
Even if CP gets KCS, CN is still eating CP's lunch. They have the tunnel in Pt. Huron, the "J" around Chicago and CP has to run its stuff via Elkhart. They may finally purchase the P. M. thru Grand Rapids. Okay guy's, shoot a hole in this!
- Saturnalia
- Authority on Cat
- Posts: 15412
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
- Location: Michigan City, IN
- Contact:
Re: CP to Buy KCS
I don't think they could really split KCS like that did with Conrail. Big Blue had a "big X" route structure, with an Albany-St Louis and Philly-Chicago set of lines crossing in Cleveland. Ultimately it made operational sense to give Albany-St Louis to CSX and NS got Philly-Chicago. This made sense in terms of adding good routes to complement the existing networks and keep competition balanced. I guess I just don't see where KCS offers a similar opportunity, and with the CN already owning the IC, even a split like that would leave CP disadvantaged to CN.David Lang wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 5:31 pmHoping this is not a dumb question here, but since both CP and CN both want KCS, and there seems to be pros and cons to either railroad acquiring KCS, is it possible that KCS could be split up among both CP and CN, much like Conrail was with NS and CSX??
This is not to say that perhaps the CN may pry off a piece as a concession, but I doubt it would be a Conrail-like split.
Re: CP to Buy KCS
My Opinion... Shoot Away
I don't think CSX is gonna let the PM Go anytime soon, Once Coal Profits from J.H. Campbell start to slip, maybe, But even then, CP is still gonna run on the NS regardless. I mean, They could maybe put in a Diamond at Porter and sell off the Porter Branch and run to the IHB? But I'm not sure of the Logistics of all of that, And I doubt CP would pay for all that improvement just for their 6 Daily Run Through Trains and whatever the GR and Plymouth Produce.
Ironically bad at Small Talk
Re: CP to Buy KCS
You’d have to think that CP’s recent outright purchase of the Detroit Windsor tunnel was in anticipation of this KCS merger. With full control of the tunnel and a KCS merger, I’d fully expect them to either improve the clearance of the existing tunnel to fit double stacks, or build a new tunnel, just like CN did in Port Huron.
- DaveO
- Read more, think more, post less
- Posts: 1469
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:57 pm
- Location: Between here and there
Re: CP to Buy KCS
Most of the tunnels length is a tube.bnsfben wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 8:00 pmYou’d have to think that CP’s recent outright purchase of the Detroit Windsor tunnel was in anticipation of this KCS merger. With full control of the tunnel and a KCS merger, I’d fully expect them to either improve the clearance of the existing tunnel to fit double stacks, or build a new tunnel, just like CN did in Port Huron.
They are a cast iron tube sunk to a trench in the riverbed, connected, pumped dry and then lined with concrete.
They shaved as much concrete out of the one tunnel that they could.
Autoracks and double-stacked 8'6" containers can make it through. A double stack with at least one 9'6" container will have problems.
- LansingRailFan
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 11446
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2019 4:21 pm
- Location: Lansing
- Contact:
Re: CP to Buy KCS
Traffic is way up, especially with grain biz doing what it’s doing.Talk wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 7:42 amMy Opinion... Shoot Away
I don't think CSX is gonna let the PM Go anytime soon, Once Coal Profits from J.H. Campbell start to slip, maybe, But even then, CP is still gonna run on the NS regardless. I mean, They could maybe put in a Diamond at Porter and sell off the Porter Branch and run to the IHB? But I'm not sure of the Logistics of all of that, And I doubt CP would pay for all that improvement just for their 6 Daily Run Through Trains and whatever the GR and Plymouth Produce.