Page 2 of 3

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2020 7:49 pm
by M.D.Bentley
I am that 1 % ! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 5:21 pm
by PatAzo
To LansingRailFan's point the shoreline's at least do check forums and social media. I know of one railroad employee who posts here occasionally that was terminated over social media posts.

To Doktor No's point I don't know what it is like today but years ago the only people class ones could get into the operating supervisory ranks were guys who didn't have seniority to hold a steady job (they were stuck with whatever BS they were handed) or trainees hired from the outside. I used to know a road foreman who was in the former. After he took the job he followed the trains through his territory and figured out where corners got cut and who needed coaching. The crews respected him and they looked out for each other. One day he's called on the carpet for not writing enough violations. He explained violations were down. Broken knuckles, drawbars, yard derailments everything was down. His superiors told him if he wasn't writing violations he wasn't doing his job. Do some signal checks, too fast past an approach was an easy violation. He got back to the yard office, looked at the seniority list, discovered he could could hold a 2nd shift yard engine in Detroit and was gone. The next guy stuck with it about a year before Amtrak recruited him to the east coast.

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:45 pm
by TSB
LansingRailFan wrote:
Sat Dec 26, 2020 4:20 pm
Is GLC Union?
Yes. SEIU

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:21 am
by AARR
How did SEIU become a railroad's representative? They specialize in housekeeping and service personnel.
TSB wrote:
Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:45 pm
LansingRailFan wrote:
Sat Dec 26, 2020 4:20 pm
Is GLC Union?
Yes. SEIU

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:27 am
by Chip
AARR wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:21 am
How did SEIU become a railroad's representative? They specialize in housekeeping and service personnel.
TSB wrote:
Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:45 pm
LansingRailFan wrote:
Sat Dec 26, 2020 4:20 pm
Is GLC Union?
Yes. SEIU
The same reason the UAW represents Casino workers. Need that sweet, sweet dues money.

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:29 am
by ns8401
AARR wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:21 am
How did SEIU become a railroad's representative? They specialize in housekeeping and service personnel.
TSB wrote:
Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:45 pm
LansingRailFan wrote:
Sat Dec 26, 2020 4:20 pm
Is GLC Union?
Yes. SEIU
Any Union can represent any company. The specialty really doesn’t make a difference.

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:31 am
by SD80MAC
FWIW, 397 will be going to Progress Rail to be rebuilt.

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:53 am
by TC Man
SD80MAC wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:31 am
FWIW, 397 will be going to Progress Rail to be rebuilt.
Thanks for the update. My guess is that with the frame issue, it'll go via flatcar, as I doubt a class 1 will take it on it's own wheels...

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 2:02 pm
by AndrewsTrains
SD80MAC wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:31 am
FWIW, 397 will be going to Progress Rail to be rebuilt.
Will it be speced to gp38-3 anything engine done or will it just be the frame

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:50 pm
by TSB
AARR wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:21 am
How did SEIU become a railroad's representative? They specialize in housekeeping and service personnel.
TSB wrote:
Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:45 pm
LansingRailFan wrote:
Sat Dec 26, 2020 4:20 pm
Is GLC Union?
Yes. SEIU
SEIU took over the M of W union that had represented all of the non-running trades of the company.

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 6:51 pm
by KingsleyRailFan
I'm glad they're opting to repair it. Seeing as how GLC uses almost all of their engines on a daily basis and that's one of my childhood engines, I'm glad to see it being repaired.

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 7:47 pm
by ns8401
KingsleyRailFan wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 6:51 pm
I'm glad they're opting to repair it. Seeing as how GLC uses almost all of their engines on a daily basis and that's one of my childhood engines, I'm glad to see it being repaired.
How long have they had the 397?

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:24 pm
by AndrewsTrains
ns8401 wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 7:47 pm
KingsleyRailFan wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 6:51 pm
I'm glad they're opting to repair it. Seeing as how GLC uses almost all of their engines on a daily basis and that's one of my childhood engines, I'm glad to see it being repaired.
How long have they had the 397?
2/15/2011 is the first picture of it on rrpics, previous life for 397 was UP 451(GP38-2) LLPX 2327(GP38-2) PC 8015(GP38-2) GLC 397(GP38-2) CR 8015(GP38-2) EMDX 815(GP38-2) build date is 8/1972

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 11:03 pm
by ns8401
If 2011 is the first pic and it’s an engine from his childhood then I must be getting old...

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 11:30 pm
by SD80MAC
ns8401 wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 11:03 pm
If 2011 is the first pic and it’s an engine from his childhood then I must be getting old...
I was thinking the same thing.

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:00 am
by AndrewsTrains
ns8401 wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 11:03 pm
If 2011 is the first pic and it’s an engine from his childhood then I must be getting old...
I'm a teenager but I'm getting old because i remember nkp 765 conrail and the gmtx on glc long ago

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:28 pm
by TC Man
AndrewsTrains wrote:
Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:00 am
ns8401 wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 11:03 pm
If 2011 is the first pic and it’s an engine from his childhood then I must be getting old...
I'm a teenager but I'm getting old because i remember nkp 765 conrail and the gmtx on glc long ago
So is was built a year after my build date. :)

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:30 pm
by AndrewsTrains
TC Man wrote:
Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:28 pm
AndrewsTrains wrote:
Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:00 am
ns8401 wrote:
Wed Jan 20, 2021 11:03 pm
If 2011 is the first pic and it’s an engine from his childhood then I must be getting old...
I'm a teenager but I'm getting old because i remember nkp 765 conrail and the gmtx on glc long ago
So is was built a year after my build date. :)
LOL my moms as old as a cf7 fa unit build date on Indiana rr

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 4:23 pm
by KingsleyRailFan
I may be thinking of another engine. I remember most of the engines like that had that color scheme, and I distinctly remember seeing 397 a few times in 2012/2013. That was almost 10 years back.

Re: GLC GP38 incident

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:43 pm
by MQT1223
I'm amazed that 397 is being rebuilt. Seems like when a frame is bent that its usually the death knell of a locomotive.