GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Michigan.
firemedic54
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:10 am
Location: Holly, MI.

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by firemedic54 »

We drove by there last night around 8pm before signing off for the day. RJ Corman has a bunch of trucks there ready to go. Very little activity as it was still raining pretty good so my guess is they'll wait until daylight before starting any work.

chapmaja
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1331
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:02 pm

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by chapmaja »

Thankfully this isn't a mainline like the Water Level that sees close to a hundred trains per day. They can afford to take their time with the cleanup. Even if they lose a day or two of movements south of the wreck site, it won't hamper the economy of the region.

I find it interesting that the back portion of cars all rolled to the side the way they did. I guess it's just from the way the train moved and came to a stop based on the rail that actually broke.

hoborich
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2992
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:05 am
Location: Northern Michigan

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by hoborich »

The Detroit News reported the train derailed at 40 mph. Not sure how accurate that is, but in the pics one of the cars is quite high in the air, and run up on the car ahead of it. Also quite a few cars derailed. That stretch of track was never good for 40 mph.

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/m ... /81744056/
"Ask your doctor if medical advice from a TV commercial is right for you".

firemedic54
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:10 am
Location: Holly, MI.

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by firemedic54 »

The engineer told me he was doing 33mph accelerating to track speed when the accident occurred.

Steve B
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1294
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:03 pm
Location: East Lansing

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by Steve B »

Back in the day the Ann Arbor's system speed limit for freights was 45 MPH. This lasted until the track began to deteriorate (late '60s?) In the 1939 ETT (for sale at Durand Union Station) the only speed restrictions between Ann Arbor and Owosso were at Howell and the Durand diamonds.

Interestingly the '39 ETT shows a speed limit of 35 on tangent, 30 curves for *loaded* hoppers.

hoborich
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2992
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:05 am
Location: Northern Michigan

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by hoborich »

Back in the 70s, I used to watch them going through the Oak Grove/Cohoctah area, and they were usually just creeping along, maybe 20 mph at best.
"Ask your doctor if medical advice from a TV commercial is right for you".

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38225
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by AARR »

I don't know what the speed limit is but it's my understanding from a presentation Chris Bagwell gave at the annual AARRT&HA meeting a few years ago that the keep their trains around 30mph for fuel economy even though the track is rated higher (40mph perhaps?).
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

NYCMan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:00 pm

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by NYCMan »

Fuel economy? In a diesel locomotive? Just idling, they don't burn fuel, they burn MONEY.

Per FRA, speed limits based upon track class are as follows for freight:
Class 1 = 10 MPH; Class 2 = 25 MPH; Class 3 = 40 MPH; Class 4 = 60 MPH.

Fuel consumption rates vary per locomotive, even within its own class. Many factors affect fuel consumption including mechanical conditions and operator operations.

The biggest cause of a derailment is speed in excess of exigent track conditions.

User avatar
BerkshireKid
sofa king we todd
Posts: 1539
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:22 pm

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by BerkshireKid »

Speed limit in that area minus any temporary slow orders is 40mph... And they run every bit of it
Rule #1: BerkshireKid is God. Rule #2: God is always right. Rule #3: If you think you may actually be right refer to Rules #1 & #2.

NYCMan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:00 pm

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by NYCMan »

Jointed rail normally is 39 feet long. Thus, if the rail were 3 feet long, sounds like a patch job of some sort had been done and was a "weak link" waiting for an accident to happen.

User avatar
BerkshireKid
sofa king we todd
Posts: 1539
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:22 pm

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by BerkshireKid »

Jointed rail can be 39' ft long.... It can also be 33' or 30'or whatever size the railroad ordered. I've seen it all out there.
It was stated a 3' piece of rail was broken... It never said a 3' section of rail that was a patch job as you imply. Rail goes thru stresses and can just break... Even brand new welded rail.
Rule #1: BerkshireKid is God. Rule #2: God is always right. Rule #3: If you think you may actually be right refer to Rules #1 & #2.

Steve B
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1294
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:03 pm
Location: East Lansing

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by Steve B »

In recent years GLC has also been installing 78-foot jointed rail in some spots. I've noticed it between MP 200 & 201 (replacing 90-lb rail from 1949) and along US-127 near Ithaca.

firemedic54
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:10 am
Location: Holly, MI.

Re: GLC Grain Train Derailment 3/13/2016

Unread post by firemedic54 »

Just saw RJ Corman trucks heading towards 96 on M-59. Guessing their work is done. Will try to get over there and take a look.

Post Reply