Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Indiana.
9xs
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 347
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:37 pm

Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by 9xs »

CSX has apparently removed the crossovers and switch to the NS at Pine Jct. CSX traffic to Barr now must go via the UP at Dolton.

User avatar
justalurker66
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1525
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:51 am

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by justalurker66 »

Interesting. I occasionally would see that in use in conjunction with the one at Curtis yard. It is showing OOS on ATCS.

Did CSX add anything at Pine Jct? I expect a connection to the old Fort Wayne Secondary to be added at some point (to allow trains from Tollston to the Barr Subdivision).

9xs
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 347
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:37 pm

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by 9xs »

there were double crossovers there too, now using the crossovers at Cline Ave. Will have to look for new intermediate signals replacing the Pine interlocking signals

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 8588
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by SD80MAC »

Wow, crazy. IIRC Q368 and Q369 (I think) used it historically to get to and from the BRC via the NS. We would occasionally use it on N800/801 and E800/E801 to get around congestion on the NS between 497 and 501.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

rob
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:56 am
Location: grand Rapids

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by rob »

9xs wrote:CSX has apparently removed the crossovers and switch to the NS at Pine Jct. CSX traffic to Barr now must go via the UP at Dolton.
The crossovers at pine have be removed but the connection track to cp501 is still in use.

Rob

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13965
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by Saturnalia »

SD80MAC wrote:Wow, crazy. IIRC Q368 and Q369 (I think) used it historically to get to and from the BRC via the NS. We would occasionally use it on N800/801 and E800/E801 to get around congestion on the NS between 497 and 501.
Is the 501 connection a way for CSX to get to the BRC? I never heard heard why CSX was using the NS west of Pine...
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

Typhoon
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1134
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:16 pm
Location: Under a palm tree

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by Typhoon »

Saturnalia wrote:
SD80MAC wrote:Wow, crazy. IIRC Q368 and Q369 (I think) used it historically to get to and from the BRC via the NS. We would occasionally use it on N800/801 and E800/E801 to get around congestion on the NS between 497 and 501.
Is the 501 connection a way for CSX to get to the BRC? I never heard heard why CSX was using the NS west of Pine...

Yes, it is one of the ways CSX uses to get to the Belt.

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13965
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by Saturnalia »

Typhoon wrote:
Saturnalia wrote:
SD80MAC wrote:Wow, crazy. IIRC Q368 and Q369 (I think) used it historically to get to and from the BRC via the NS. We would occasionally use it on N800/801 and E800/E801 to get around congestion on the NS between 497 and 501.
Is the 501 connection a way for CSX to get to the BRC? I never heard heard why CSX was using the NS west of Pine...

Yes, it is one of the ways CSX uses to get to the Belt.
What’s the history of that route option? Seems odd that CSX would be able to go that way.
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
justalurker66
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1525
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:51 am

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by justalurker66 »

ATCS no longer shows the "Out of Service" indication on CP 501's connection to Pine Jct.

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13965
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by Saturnalia »

justalurker66 wrote:ATCS no longer shows the "Out of Service" indication on CP 501's connection to Pine Jct.
Q326 used it this evening...
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
justalurker66
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1525
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:51 am

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by justalurker66 »

Saturnalia wrote:
justalurker66 wrote:ATCS no longer shows the "Out of Service" indication on CP 501's connection to Pine Jct.
Q326 used it this evening...
Good to see. Some time when life calms down I want to get over that way to railfan. It has been more than 10 weeks since my last railfan trip of more than 20 miles. (I feel like I'm reporting in AA - except not railfanning isn't a good thing.)

There is a lot of track, crossovers and connections in that area.

rob
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:56 am
Location: grand Rapids

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by rob »

Saturnalia wrote:
justalurker66 wrote:ATCS no longer shows the "Out of Service" indication on CP 501's connection to Pine Jct.
Q326 used it this evening...
Q326 does not use the that connection they use the one at 497.

Rob

LakeATCS
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 620
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 5:37 am

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by LakeATCS »

The Pine to 501 connection was part of the original passenger route into the City.

It’s a mess to try an explain, but the B&O crossed over the NYC to go over the canal at hick on its own bridge, it then crossed the river next to the PRR and NYC only to dive under both and connect to the Rock to get back to the BOCT.

If it sounds whacked, it is because it was, the B&O passenger route into the city was the most messed up arrangement ever.

CSX still has customers on the route between Hick and the river. They use the NS between 501 and 503 now instead of the old B&O bridge. It’s called the Lake Subdivison.

Amtrak also used the connection to get on the CSX route until 2005.

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13965
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by Saturnalia »

rob wrote:
Saturnalia wrote:
justalurker66 wrote:ATCS no longer shows the "Out of Service" indication on CP 501's connection to Pine Jct.
Q326 used it this evening...
Q326 does not use the that connection they use the one at 497.

Rob
Yup you’re right I got ahead of myself. Q326 was spotted using the 497/Curtis connection not 501.
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
justalurker66
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1525
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:51 am

Re: Pine Jct switches and crossovers removed

Unread post by justalurker66 »

Not sure what it is, but ATCS is showing a WB train entering NS at CP 501 from CSX passing WB past CP 503.
The train is long enough that it is occupying track on the east side of the canal in CP 503 and the lead from Pine Jct.
Currently cleared to stop at CP 509 on Track 2.

EDIT 7:10pm ET
Train from Pine Jct now cleared to leave NS at CP 509 headed for BRC.

Post Reply