CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Daily whereabouts of train locations along with sightings for heads ups to other railfans.
User avatar
Tom49801
Bangor Webcam Master
Posts: 23832
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Tom49801 »

L301-16 (former D700) @ 15:13 eastward reported by the DD mp CG91.9 with 34 axles & 465 feet long. CSX engine #4384 & 7 cars.

User avatar
SW
Rail Trail Explorer
Posts: 11082
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: Owosso, MI - 1 mile north of the GLC

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by SW »

SB L313 (former D736) just cleared Middle River. CSX 5483 + LSRC 6356 + 89 cars.
Owosso Steve

User avatar
Tom49801
Bangor Webcam Master
Posts: 23832
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Tom49801 »

bkoole98 wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:02 pm
So, only 59 cars and they're using a rear dpu on 326. It seems as though they use a dpu on trains that wouldn't need one, and then you get a 326 with 120 cars with two lead units and no dpu. Just an example, it's what I've noticed. I'm sure weight of the train as something to do with this.
Sometime last year, CSX had made a change to their operating rules stating if both engines are DPU capable, they are to run in DPU mode regardless of their car count (I guess that saves them on EOT usage). We had actually seen Q327 run from Grand Rapids to Chicago with only 1 car & the engines were running in DPU mode.

For the the Saugatuck Hill at approx mp CG32.5 going eastward, trains over 10,000 tons are to run with DPU. But, we have seen trains stall out on the hill due to weather conditions (wet rails, snow) that were under 10,000 tons.

BNSF had also made a change not too long ago where their loaded coal trains are to be ran with a single leader & a rear DPU instead of the 2 engines on the headend. They still need extra power added to make it over the Saugatuck Hill & typically 2 CSX engines are added behind the leader. The reason explained to me was by doing this, no one has to go to the rear of the train to add the extra power & having also to re-program the PTC for the rear units.

bkoole98
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 7:25 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by bkoole98 »

Tom49801 wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:27 pm
bkoole98 wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:02 pm
So, only 59 cars and they're using a rear dpu on 326. It seems as though they use a dpu on trains that wouldn't need one, and then you get a 326 with 120 cars with two lead units and no dpu. Just an example, it's what I've noticed. I'm sure weight of the train as something to do with this.
Sometime last year, CSX had made a change to their operating rules stating if both engines are DPU capable, they are to run in DPU mode regardless of their car count (I guess that saves them on EOT usage). We had actually seen Q327 run from Grand Rapids to Chicago with only 1 car & the engines were running in DPU mode.

For the the Saugatuck Hill at approx mp CG32.5 going eastward, trains over 10,000 tons are to run with DPU. But, we have seen trains stall out on the hill due to weather conditions (wet rails, snow) that were under 10,000 tons.

BNSF had also made a change not too long ago where their loaded coal trains are to be ran with a single leader & a rear DPU instead of the 2 engines on the headend. They still need extra power added to make it over the Saugatuck Hill & typically 2 CSX engines are added behind the leader. The reason explained to me was by doing this, no one has to go to the rear of the train to add the extra power & having also to re-program the PTC for the rear units.
That actually makes sense about the EOT usage, and so does the rest for that matter. Thanks for the information.

User avatar
Tom49801
Bangor Webcam Master
Posts: 23832
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Tom49801 »

N800-16 @ 15:45 eastward reported by the DD mp CG91.9 with 532 axles & 6,968 feet long. BNSF engine #5775 & 130 loaded coal cars & rear dpu BNSF #9190. He will take Kirk siding mp CG70.2 & tie down there since Grand Jct has a loaded coal train & Wells siding has an empty coal train tied down.

You're welcome BKoole98 :)
Last edited by Tom49801 on Fri Mar 18, 2022 6:48 am, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Tom49801
Bangor Webcam Master
Posts: 23832
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Tom49801 »

L301-16 (former D700) @ 16:01:20 eastward Bangor's Division St crossing cam mp CG60.93 with CSX engine #4384 & 7 cars.

User avatar
amessmann
Signal Maintainer
Posts: 1551
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 4:58 pm
Location: East Lansing, MI

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by amessmann »

L305 west over Farm Ln. ~ CH 84.5. Looked like they had just two cars.
Last edited by amessmann on Wed Mar 16, 2022 6:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Tom49801
Bangor Webcam Master
Posts: 23832
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Tom49801 »

L301-16 (former D700) @ 16:23 eastward reported by the DD mp CG44.2 with 34 axles & 476 feet long. CSX engine #4384 & 7 cars.

L301-16 (former D700) @ 16:51 eastward Holland Depot mp 25.3 Main Track to Pass Main.
Last edited by Tom49801 on Wed Mar 16, 2022 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
amessmann
Signal Maintainer
Posts: 1551
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 4:58 pm
Location: East Lansing, MI

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by amessmann »

L303 eastbound by Farm Ln. ~ CH 84.5. 16:58
Last edited by amessmann on Wed Mar 16, 2022 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tom49801
Bangor Webcam Master
Posts: 23832
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Tom49801 »

L301-16 (former D700) @ 17:31 eastward reported by the DD mp CG19.1 with 70 axles & 1,069 feet long. CSX engine #4384 & 16 cars.

User avatar
Micah_D
The Railroad Empire
Posts: 634
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2020 7:23 am
Location: South Lyon, MI

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Micah_D »

6:27pm - L303-16 Clear Green Oak DD reporting 408 Axles, 5702 feet.

6:30pm - L303-16 Clear EE South Lyon.

User avatar
SW
Rail Trail Explorer
Posts: 11082
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: Owosso, MI - 1 mile north of the GLC

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by SW »

Micah_D wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 6:27 pm
6:27pm - L303-16 Clear Green Oak DD reporting 408 Axles, 5702 feet.

6:30pm - L303-16 Clear EE South Lyon.
Cleared Plymouth diamond just now. CSX 3428 + 5213 + 99 cars.
Owosso Steve

User avatar
SW
Rail Trail Explorer
Posts: 11082
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: Owosso, MI - 1 mile north of the GLC

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by SW »

SB D716 (or whatever it's called now) just cleared Plymouth diamond. CSX 6143 + 4 boxcars + 5 gons.
Owosso Steve

User avatar
LansingRailFan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 11383
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2019 4:21 pm
Location: Lansing
Contact:

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by LansingRailFan »

19:30 - Plymouth

NB 2-unit Q510 clearing now w unknown power. Big heavy tren.

Edit: leader was CSX 357

NB 2-unit I132 with UP and KCS next. Stopped at Lilley.
Edit: power was…UP 4793/KCS 4110

L302 waiting to to go West w CSX 5313 up front

D714 is SB with CSX 6543ish

L311 with CSX 5276/second unit unk
Last edited by LansingRailFan on Wed Mar 16, 2022 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rob
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 311
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:56 am
Location: grand Rapids

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by rob »

bkoole98 wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:45 pm
Tom49801 wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:27 pm
bkoole98 wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:02 pm
So, only 59 cars and they're using a rear dpu on 326. It seems as though they use a dpu on trains that wouldn't need one, and then you get a 326 with 120 cars with two lead units and no dpu. Just an example, it's what I've noticed. I'm sure weight of the train as something to do with this.
Sometime last year, CSX had made a change to their operating rules stating if both engines are DPU capable, they are to run in DPU mode regardless of their car count (I guess that saves them on EOT usage). We had actually seen Q327 run from Grand Rapids to Chicago with only 1 car & the engines were running in DPU mode.

For the the Saugatuck Hill at approx mp CG32.5 going eastward, trains over 10,000 tons are to run with DPU. But, we have seen trains stall out on the hill due to weather conditions (wet rails, snow) that were under 10,000 tons.

BNSF had also made a change not too long ago where their loaded coal trains are to be ran with a single leader & a rear DPU instead of the 2 engines on the headend. They still need extra power added to make it over the Saugatuck Hill & typically 2 CSX engines are added behind the leader. The reason explained to me was by doing this, no one has to go to the rear of the train to add the extra power & having also to re-program the PTC for the rear units.
That actually makes sense about the EOT usage, and so does the rest for that matter. Thanks for the information.
it s nothing to do with eot. it's because the engines comes from Wyoming with 3 engine and they would set out the rear dpu and hand off to csx. the when the train got to grand jct we would put the csx one on the rear and go up the hill. we had problem getting the csx and bn to talk to each other and too much time to get them to work. so the trainmaster(mto) at the time came up with the using the bn dpu and add the csx up front as a faster was to get it set up for the hill and using lest crews. it does cause more moves at the plant to get the engine where they need to be

rob

User avatar
Tom49801
Bangor Webcam Master
Posts: 23832
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Tom49801 »

rob wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:29 pm
bkoole98 wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:45 pm
Tom49801 wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:27 pm


Sometime last year, CSX had made a change to their operating rules stating if both engines are DPU capable, they are to run in DPU mode regardless of their car count (I guess that saves them on EOT usage). We had actually seen Q327 run from Grand Rapids to Chicago with only 1 car & the engines were running in DPU mode.

For the the Saugatuck Hill at approx mp CG32.5 going eastward, trains over 10,000 tons are to run with DPU. But, we have seen trains stall out on the hill due to weather conditions (wet rails, snow) that were under 10,000 tons.

BNSF had also made a change not too long ago where their loaded coal trains are to be ran with a single leader & a rear DPU instead of the 2 engines on the headend. They still need extra power added to make it over the Saugatuck Hill & typically 2 CSX engines are added behind the leader. The reason explained to me was by doing this, no one has to go to the rear of the train to add the extra power & having also to re-program the PTC for the rear units.
That actually makes sense about the EOT usage, and so does the rest for that matter. Thanks for the information.
it s nothing to do with eot. it's because the engines comes from Wyoming with 3 engine and they would set out the rear dpu and hand off to csx. the when the train got to grand jct we would put the csx one on the rear and go up the hill. we had problem getting the csx and bn to talk to each other and too much time to get them to work. so the trainmaster(mto) at the time came up with the using the bn dpu and add the csx up front as a faster was to get it set up for the hill and using lest crews. it does cause more moves at the plant to get the engine where they need to be

rob
The EOT comment was in reference to Q326 & Q327 - not about the coal trains.

GRHC
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1883
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:32 am

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by GRHC »

Amtrak P370-16 is running 24 minutes behind schedule @ 20:42 according to my ex-wife who’s on board the train

User avatar
Tom49801
Bangor Webcam Master
Posts: 23832
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Tom49801 »

GR H & C wrote:
Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:56 pm
Amtrak P370-16 is running 24 minutes behind schedule @ 20:42 according to my ex-wife who’s on board the train
Amtrak P370-16 @ 21:32 eastward reported by the DD mp CG91.9 with 16 axles & 305 feet long. IDTX #4630 & 3 SuperLiners.

User avatar
Tom49801
Bangor Webcam Master
Posts: 23832
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Tom49801 »

Amtrak P370-16 @ 22:09:16 eastward Bangor’s Division St crossing cam mp CG60.93 with IDTX #4630 & 3 SuperLiners (2 passengers Off at the station mp CG60.5)

Dan Cluley
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2661
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:58 am
Location: Lansing

Re: CSX Train Location Updates - March 2022

Unread post by Dan Cluley »

L302 west through East Lansing at 22:21

Locked