Page 4 of 4

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:23 am
by TrainWatcher
one word: GARBAGE...

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:32 pm
by Y@
TrainWatcher wrote:one word: GARBAGE...
Quit crying and be happy somebody took the time to even do it! They may not be fully accurate, but WHO THE HELL CARES. You fark foamers and your constant female dog about little BS are astounding. Get over it James.

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:56 pm
by heartlandguy
I think they look great. IMO, the only thing that should be changed is the number boards. I really don't care that there is ATSF paint on an ex-SP F, I'm just happy to see that scheme on the rails...

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:35 pm
by Clay320
I'm just not seeing the catastrophe here. They are absolutely beautiful units portraying perhaps the most iconic railroad road in North America, the mighty ATSF.

No preservation effort is ever going to be 100% accurate, even less so when the thing being preserved is not necessarily the original, and has to function and operate in the real world and not sit stuffed and mounted in a car barn of some museum.


Are the Strasburg Steam engines and coaches garbage because they all say Strasburg on them and not in their historical paint? Serious question, why do some places like Strasburg (and the WM/LS&I engine as mentioned, along with others) get a free pass while the locomotives like in this thread don't?

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:09 pm
by SD80MAC
Clay320 wrote:I'm just not seeing the catastrophe here. They are absolutely beautiful units portraying perhaps the most iconic railroad road in North America, the mighty ATSF.

No preservation effort is ever going to be 100% accurate, even less so when the thing being preserved is not necessarily the original, and has to function and operate in the real world and not sit stuffed and mounted in a car barn of some museum.


Are the Strasburg Steam engines and coaches garbage because they all say Strasburg on them and not in their historical paint? Serious question, why do some places like Strasburg (and the WM/LS&I engine as mentioned, along with others) get a free pass while the locomotives like in this thread don't?
I know, I don't get it. We should be getting crucified at C&M because 7014 doesn't say GTW on it, by that logic.

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:23 pm
by Y@
SD80MAC wrote:I know, I don't get it. We should be getting crucified at C&M because 7014 doesn't say GTW on it, by that logic.
It's just a few special foamers running their mouths and whining because they have nothing better to do.

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:47 pm
by Saturnalia
Aside from the horn placement, looks like a ATSF unit to me!

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:25 pm
by Racer
I like the ATSF units. Railfans have zero control over what happens to locomotives such as these ATSF F units. People arguing about it is certainly not going to do change anything about it. I think these units are cool and gives me another rare gem to catch on America's railroad network.

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 7:00 am
by legostudios34
I like them alright. They capture the general look of ATSF F7s. The only things I have a problem with are the horn placement, the ditch lights, and the number boards.

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:54 am
by CERY
It's funny to me because I see real ATSF and BN units every day. Nothing like switching with a ATSF patched SD40-2, oh the turbo sounds great.

Re: ATSF to return to the rails

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 12:14 am
by DT&I
Exactly, there are still BN and ATSF units out there in original paint, If you want to see that scheme, its on C44-9W's and C40-8W's. But yes still looks like a warbonnet to me.